The Right to Trial by Jury

3rd July 2020

The Right to Trial by Jury

The indication by the Lord Chancellor last week that the government is considering removing the right to trial by jury for certain offences, in a bid to reduce the Crown Court backlog caused by Covid-19, has been met with almost unanimous rejection by criminal lawyers.

The right to trial by jury is undoubtably a corner stone of the English justice system. Famously described as “the lamp that shows that freedom lives”, it is not surprising that there has been a forcible push back from the legal community to the suggestion that this 800-year-old right be varied in any substantial way. But, what are the changes that are being considered, who would be affected by them and is it really a big deal?

The English legal system operates on a three-tiered structure in relation to seriousness of offences. Trials for the most serious offences, such as rape and murder, can only be heard by a Judge and Jury in the Crown Court. Trials for the least serious offences can only be heard by three magistrates in the Magistrates Court. The middle tier consists of offences which are “triable either-way”, such as Theft or Assault occasioning Actual Bodily Harm. A person charged with an either-way offence currently has the right to elect trial by jury, even if the magistrates consider they have enough sentencing power to deal with their case.

The proposal is that the right of defendants to elect a trial by jury for either-way offences be removed for a period of time and the trials be heard instead by a Judge and two magistrates.

One issue with this suggestion is that this removes the public’s involvement in an area of criminal justice, involvement which has always been seen as extremely important in retaining public confidence in law and order.

The Lord Chief Justice has suggested that as Magistrates are lay people we would be retaining the lay public’s involvement in these cases. However, whilst Magistrates are not legally qualified individuals, they are undoubtably more case hardened than your average juror and this is a point of contention for many.

However, more importantly, a person’s right to be tried by a jury, particularly when they risk losing their liberty, equates to the right to be tried by a representative cross-section of their community. A jury will be made up of twelve randomly selected people of different ages, ethnicities, educational backgrounds and with different philosophies, all of which they bring to the court room. Despite efforts to diversify the backgrounds of judges and magistrates, it is argued that the same degree of diversity does not exist. This makes the proposal currently under consideration a point of serious concern for many and, therefore, a very big deal.

Blog Posts

Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – FAQS

06/04/2020

As part of its package to support employers, businesses and employees during the COVID-19…

Read More
Upcoming Events

Supply Chain Supper Club – February 2020

05/02/2020

This event is invite only. If you would like to receive an invite, please…

Read More
News Posts

Gotelee’s Covid-19 Risk Assessment

29/07/2020

Please click here to read Gotelee’s Covid-19 Risk Assessment    

Read More

Testimonials

"This is by far the go-to firm for any issues. You are made to feel valued from the outset and they are so confident in what they do. Wouldn't recommend any other. Thank you Hugh and Max."

- Ros Jones

"We were very pleased to have Jade as our solicitor, the service was excellent and we felt kept in the loop which minimised stress"

- CT

"Approachable, very efficient, always willing to take my calls and update me."

- SH

"We found Rachel Dawson outstanding, polite, professional and caring."

-

"Jade Shelton was absolutely fantastic!! Professional and proactive at all times."

- JH

"Prompt, helpful, polite and very professional service"

-

"I don't think this house sale would have pulled together without Jo's determination and expertise. Excellent!"

- MT

"“ This is the second time we have used Tracey for the conveyancing to buy our new home. She is always completely approachable, she has helped us along the way with advice and useful tips that has helped lessen the stress. We have complete confidence in her and would not hesitate to recommend her to our friends and family”.  - Peter Dawes, Cater Dawes Financial Planning "

-

"Jade made the process of buying our first home quick, easy and took the stress out of a new chapter of our lives"

-

"The ease that we could access and speak to Pat Smith - Thank you"

-

Please select preferred method of contact

* We will only contact you by telephone if you select this as primary form of contact. All web enquiries will be stored on our website for 30 days.