Banoffee Pies Incident Led to Fair Dismissal

3rd June 2014

Banoffee Pies Incident Led to Fair Dismissal

A warehouse manager who was sacked for disobeying an instruction to load four banoffee pies onto a lorry before he went home at the end of his shift has been stripped of his right to compensation by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

The man had worked as manager of the foodstuffs warehouse for seven years and had suffered from work-related stress in the past. His employer was of the view that his performance was declining and he had been given warnings in relation to his dealings with more junior staff and his failure to do as he was told. The pies incident triggered disciplinary proceedings that led to his dismissal for misconduct.

The Employment Tribunal (ET) upheld his claim for unfair dismissal and awarded him substantial damages on the basis that the pies incident, which had happened when he was exhausted at the end of a 13-hour shift, was ‘so slight a matter’ that dismissal fell outside the range of reasonable responses that was open to the employer.

In upholding the employer’s appeal and ruling that the man’s dismissal was fair, the EAT found that the ET had fallen into the trap of substituting its own view as to the seriousness of the matter for that of the employer. A thorough disciplinary procedure had been followed; the employer genuinely believed that it was a case of misconduct and, in failing to load the pies when instructed to do so, the man had been guilty of ‘flat disobedience’.

Comment

This case emphasises that it is the role of the ET to decide if dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses for an employer to take, and it is not for them to determine what they would have done in that scenario. Although at one end of the scale one employer might not have dismissed in these circumstances, it was nevertheless reasonable for this employer to have done so given the fact that the employer was satisfied that this was a case of disobedience, rather than forgetfulness, and the employee had already been given previous warnings for not doing as he was told.

Blog Posts

Hundreds of cases dropped over evidence disclosure failings

30/01/2018

The right to a fair trial is one of the fundamental principles of a…

Read More
Upcoming Events

Inheritance Tax and Wills Planning Seminar

07/02/2018

What the seminar will cover... Inheritance Tax: - When does it apply; what are…

Read More
News Posts

Worrying rise in numbers of botched cosmetic procedures

21/02/2018

They were once the preserve of the rich and famous but in recent times…

Read More

Testimonials

"The friendliness of Sally Pryke making me feel at ease during the whole process"

- BV

"Always kept me informed of the progress"

- CP

"Helen Stuart was fantastic and I couldn't have asked for a better solicitor!"

- KM

"Everything was dealt with in a compassionate and friendly manner"

- AW

"Pat's service is always extremely efficient and very approachable"

- AO

"Relieved that I could leave you to deal with the legal aspect of my late husbands estate"

- DG

"We cannot thank you enough for all your hard work and sticking with us. You have been amazing and showed a lot of patience when dealing with this case and all for no reward for yourself, thank you."

- Dean Kentfield

"Approachable, very efficient, always willing to take my calls and update me."

- SH

"We were very pleased to have Jade as our solicitor, the service was excellent and we felt kept in the loop which minimised stress"

- CT

"I have used Tracey Hammond at Gotelee on a number of occasions and in my opinion, she is simply the most efficient conveyancing solicitor I have ever worked with. From the outset, she took the time to understand my specific business requirements and to date, she has exceeded all of my expectations."

- Dale Fiddy - Portobello Developments Ltd

Please select preferred method of contact

* We will only contact you by telephone if you select this as primary form of contact.